Regulation - LGIC

Amendments to Certain Requirements under the Excess Soil Regulation

Regulation Number(s):
O. Reg. 406/19
Instrument Type:
Regulation - LGIC
Bill or Act:
Environmental Protection Act, R.S.O. 1990
Summary of Decision:
To make the Excess Soil Regulation more practical and focused on higher-risk movements of soil, Ontario has finalized amendments to Ontario Regulation 406/19 and the Soil Rules to remove the excess soil reuse planning requirements for projects on low-risk sites and to provide more flexibility when storing excess soil.
Analysis of Regulatory Impact:
The proposed amendments would not provide additional compliance costs to developers, municipalities, infrastructure companies or others, as they would reduce or provide flexibility in relation to requirements that are already in the Excess Soil Regulation.

Proposed amendments to exempt low risk projects from excess soil reuse planning requirements, including registration, sampling and tracking requirements, would result in cost savings.

The proposed amendment to increase soil storage pile sizes would provide flexibility that may prevent unnecessary movement of soil to other sites for storage if the project area is limited in area for storage.
Further Information:
Proposal Number:
22-MECP021
Posting Date:
November 4, 2022
Summary of Proposal:
To make the Excess Soil Regulation more practical and focused on higher-risk movements of soil, the ministry is proposing amendments to reduce requirements applicable to low-risk projects, and to provide more flexibility when storing excess soil.

Removing reuse planning requirements from low-risk projects:
Under the Excess Soil Regulation, as of January 1, 2023, reuse planning requirements would be required for some projects, including filing a notice in the excess soil registry, retaining a qualified person to prepare an assessment of past uses, if necessary, a sampling and analysis plan and a soil characterization report, and an excess soil destination assessment report, as well as implement a tracking system.
Projects on low-risk sites, such as land that has been used for agricultural or residential purposes, may be triggered to complete these requirements if they are within an area of settlement and intend to remove 2000 cubic metres or more of excess soil. In response to concerns that these requirements are too onerous for low-risk projects, the following is proposed.
1.To amend the Excess Soil Regulation such that the reuse planning requirements would not apply to a project area if it is used or was most recently used for an agricultural or other use, a residential use, a parkland use, or an institutional (e.g., schools) use, as defined in the Records of Site Condition Regulation (O. Reg. 153/04).
As a consequence of this amendment, section 14 of the Excess Soil Regulation would be revoked because it would no longer be necessary.
This exemption would not apply, however, to a project area if the project leader determines that the project area was used as an enhanced investigation project area or that it is impacted by historical contamination.
As part of this proposal, opportunities may be taken to clarify in the regulation the triggers for the reuse planning requirements and to clarify the scope of remediation projects subject to these requirements.

Soil storage amendment:
In Section C of the Soil Rules document, incorporated by reference in the regulation, the general soil storage rules state that, for the purposes of section 24 of the regulation, soil must be stored in stockpiles and the maximum size of each stockpile shall not exceed 2,500 cubic metres. This has been found to be limiting by some stakeholders depending on the size of their site. In response, the following amendment is proposed.
2.Amend the Soil Rules document to allow soil storage piles to be a maximum of 10,000 cubic metres. Other soil storage rules would continue to apply, including the requirement to prevent any adverse effects from the storage of soil.

These amendments are proposed to come into effect on January 1, 2023.

The need for transition provisions may be considered as may the need for other regulatory amendments that clarify, but do not substantively change, existing provisions.

We will continue to work collaboratively with stakeholders and Indigenous communities and organizations on the proposed amendments and to ensure the regulations are implemented effectively.
Contact Address:
Effective Date:
January 1, 2023
Decision:
Approved